Health Data management.
I was reading an article on one of the sites to which I subscribe, and was asked my opinion about mandatory pay for performance (P4P) initiative, subsequently being renamed (euphemized) for physicians as PQRI (physician quality reporting initiative) concept/program: Medicare Link.
In that vein of thought, Medicare already plans to have in place October 1, 2008 a policy of not paying for hospital related mistakes and patient injuries (such as hospital/nursing home acquired infections, fractured hips, gastric intubations during anesthesia, postoperative complications, etc) “. Medicare currently is in its first voluntary PQRI (some aspects of which, in the areas of falls/disequilibrium also apply to physical therapists and occupational therapists) phase July 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007. In theory, it is like a lot of good ideas; on paper it would make anyone question why it hasn’t always been required.
Such rating concepts (the Better Business Bureau has ratings for local businesses, school districts have “report cards”, US News and World report publishes an annual listing of “Best of XXX” categories, etc) have been and are being developed by state and federal agencies specifically focused on health care delivery and outcomes. It of course has nuances premised as report card information which the government thinks will improve health care delivery and reduce costs. New York state’s Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, however, threatened to sue health insurance companies like Horizon if they implemented their plans; half-baked and nefarious because they are based on old as well as inaccurate data: Nursing homes, hospitals, and physician offices are the first to be “targeted”.
My reply (my opinion based on 35 years of keeping current):
We’re far off from valid standardization of P4P or PQRI rating systems. Insurance carriers can’t even properly identify member benefits let alone how members respond to rendered care. Insurance carriers can’t even (or won’t even) keep the same insured members long enough to have a longitudinal data base to assess outcomes.
There is no standard for assessment over enough criteria to warrant P4P / PQRI tools such as might be applied based for example on such criteria as Cost or number of visits/treatment sessions /patient’s term of care; accurate pathology identification for definitive diagnosis and co-morbidities influence; validity of providers administration or application of various patient health status information indexes or tools; valid environmental/ethnic/racial correlations of applied assessment tools, etc, etc, etc, do not yet exist.
Even “standard” pain and functional tool questionnaires are difficult to inter-rate/intra-rate in a single clinic. Sure a miniscule number of clinicians can be “taught” to standardize a single clinic but significant broad application ethics aren’t even on the horizon.
In fact survey after survey demonstrates a large majority (75% - 85%) of physicians aren’t even close to adopting IT as a routine practice option (on-line consultations, internet prescriptions, release of patient data to any agency that could intrude on the physician-patient confidential relationship, or use of electronic medical record keeping. Notice all those hand written charts in the vertical files (often behind the receptionist desk) with all those colorful tabs???
In fact what to call IT patient files is not yet itself standardized. Are they EMR’s (electronic medical records), EHR’s (electronic health records), or PHR’s (personal health records), add your own naming phrase. Where will these records be stored or accessed? In hospital consortiums, insurance company data bases, RHIO’s (regional health information organizations), physician offices, HIE’s (health information exchanges), in a chip under your skin, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft’s Health Vault, or some other repository system/concept.
In today’s health climate the medical providers are too disgruntled, too concerned about HIPAA, to wary of the above proof there is no standardization, not being given the time to learn and relearn the technology of it, or just plain skeptical, to even consider buying into any performance protocol. The culture isn’t there for P4P or PQRI.